Stars: 4 out of 5
Pros: Music, characters, animation, and fun
Cons: No consequences for Ariel's rebellion
The Bottom Line:
Go under the sea
For a drastically changed tale
With a poor moral
"Teenagers. You Give Them an Inch, They Swim All Over You."
Everyone with a passing knowledge of Disney history agrees
that The Little Mermaid ushered in a
renaissance of animation when it was released in 1989. And if you look at the movies that had come
out during the two pervious decades, it really is hard to argue. There is much that is right with it. And yet, there is one fatal flaw that always
bugs me when I watch it.
The story is loosely (and I do mean loosely) based on a
fairy tale from Hans Christian Andersen.
It tells the story of Ariel (voiced by Jodi Benson) a mermaid who is
fascinated by the life of the humans above the waves. She collects bits and pieces much like an archeologist
would. Her friends are Flounder (Jason
Marin) and Scuttle the seagull (Buddy Hackett).
Ariel has gotten most of her knowledge of humans from Scuttle, but since
he makes it up, it’s mostly not helpful.
Her interest in the humans has upset her father, King Triton
(Kenneth Mars), who orders his court composer Sebastian (Samuel E. Wright) to
watch over Ariel and report back to him.
But it has also attracted the attention of Ursula (Pat
Carroll), a sea witch who thinks she should be ruling the ocean instead of Triton. When Ariel falls in love with the human Prince
Eric (Christopher Daniel Barns), Ursula thinks this is the key to taking over
the kingdom. But will her plan to use
Ariel work?
Anyone familiar with the source material will be shocked to
discover just how much Disney has changed the ending. They’ve also made some other changes along
the way, like making Ursula a villain instead of just a plot devise. All this leads to a typical happy ending to
the story, which I don’t really mind. I
prefer happy endings, although it does ruin the moral of the original story.
What sets this movie apart from the rest they’d been
releasing in the 80's was the music. By
hiring Broadway composers Howard Ashman and Alan Menken, they created songs
that truly make this an animated musical worth watching. At times, the songs in the Disney movies
since Walt died had felt put in because they put songs in the film. Here, they are an important part of the
story, either by advancing the story or providing character development. Oh, there are still a couple that are a bit pointless,
but when you think of this movie, you can’t help but think of “Part of Your
World,” “Under the Sea,” and “Kiss the Girl.”
These songs are outstanding, and I love them to this day.
The animation is a step above the rest of the decade. While I do enjoy the watercolor backgrounds
we’d see in many films from the 70’s and 80’s, that technique pretty much died
with this film. You’ll see a couple
examples of it, but for the most part, this was a new commitment to beautiful
backgrounds that look more real. A few
of the shots are breathtaking, in fact.
The voice work is great as well. Until I rewatched it recently, I hadn’t
realized that Ariel is silent for almost half the film. Yet Jodi Benson uses the time she spends as
Ariel’s voice to make the character someone we want to root for. The rest of the cast brings their characters
to life with just as much intensity, which makes them much more than drawings
on our TV (or the movie screen originally).
So what’s my problem with the film? It’s the moral of the story. For the entire film, we’ve had Ariel
rebelling against her father. For his
part, Triton comes across as an ogre who is trying to control Ariel. A scene where he destroys her grotto springs
immediately to mind. Now I realize this
is an animated film, and subtlety isn’t a strength of the genre, but it would
be nice to have a little nuance to the characters. Heck, Triton is almost a villain in his own
right until the last 10 minutes of the film when he more than redeems
himself. Instead, we’ve got the typical
rebellious teen and hard nosed parent that are so stereotypical in pop culture.
You know what it would have taken to completely redeem the
film for me? One scene. If Ariel had gone to her father and
apologized for all the trouble she caused and he had apologized for his
behavior, I would love this film and whole heartedly endorse it. Instead, we get a film with a heroine who
selfishly goes after what she wants, almost destroys her father’s kingdom in
the process, and in the end gets her way without learning anything in the
process. And that’s what rankles me.
Do I like the film?
Yes. Do I appreciate it in Disney
history in ushering in a new era of great Disney films? Absolutely.
But the flawed message of the film will always keep me from loving The Little Mermaid the way I do other
Disney films.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.