Stars: 5 out of 5
Pros: A favorite film makes the live action transition beautifully
Cons: A couple of very brief moments I wish weren’t there
The Bottom Line:
Live action version
Remakes animated one
Captures its magic
Stunning. Simply Stunning.
The first time I saw the Broadway production of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, I was ready for
someone to create a live action version of the musical that I could enjoy any
time I wanted. While that’s not quite
what we got with this 2017 live action version of Beauty and the Beast, I am still very happy with the outcome.
If you are familiar with the fairy tale and especially
Disney’s 1991 animated version, you know the basics of this story. It tells the story of a spoiled prince (Dan
Stevens) who, when he turns down sheltering a hag who shows up on the doorstep
during a storm, is turned into a hideous beast.
His household servants are also cursed along with him. He has until a magical rose fades to learn to
love and get that person to love him or he will be a beast forever.
Meanwhile, in a nearby village, we meet Belle (Emma Watson). She is considered odd by everyone in the
village, and yet Gaston (Luke Evans) still has decided she is the girl he is
going to marry. However, when Belle’s
father (Kevin Kline) is captured by the Beast, it sets in motion a series of
events that just might change everyone’s lives.
Make no mistake about it – this is a remake. Unlike some of Disney’s other recent live
action movies that tell the story from a slightly different point of view or
offer a twist, there is very little here you haven’t already scene. The biggest change is we learn some about
what happened to Belle’s mother and why she is no longer in the picture. It does help flesh out her father’s
character, but I’m not sure we needed it.
There are a few other tweaks here or there, at least one of which pulls
this version closer to the original fairy tale, but they are minor overall.
Not that this is a bad thing. I love the original movie for a reason, and
they have captured the characters, their relationships, and the story that
changes them perfectly. While a few
favorite lines have been cut, others have been included, and I loved them just
as much here.
All the songs you love from the animated version are present
as well. These sequences are still show
stoppers that are a pure delight. I was
smiling through all of them. It’s
certainly interesting watching someone else put their spin on the familiar
lines.
As I hinted at earlier, they did not include the songs from
the Broadway version of the story. I was
a bit surprised that this included “Human Again” since that song was originally
written for the animated movie. I
certainly missed “Home,” although they include the music from this song the
first time that Belle sees her room in the castle. The biggest loss is “Me,” the song that
Gaston sings in the play when he proposes to Belle. Seriously, that song is so hilarious I would
have loved to see it here although I’m not quite sure it fit the tone of this
movie.
Instead of those songs, we get several new songs here. Honestly, they are all forgettable and don’t
really add much to the story. The one
exception to that is “Evermore,” the song that Beast sings after he lets Belle
go. It is powerful and powerfully
executed by Dan Stevens.
Speaking of actors, the cast is wonderful. Yes, most of the main cast are once again
voice actors since the various objects in the castle were done by CGI. Emma Watson’s background in the Harry Potter
movies served her in good stead here since she knows how to act believably
against an object that isn’t yet there.
The voice cast includes such actors as Ewan McGregor, Ian McKellen, Emma
Thompson, Audra McDonald, and Stanley Tucci.
And the CGI, including much of the Beast, is just as
wonderfully done. I never doubted what I
was seeing for a moment. From the
previews, I thought the objects might look very odd, but they didn’t
really. In fact, I quite liked how they
were done.
I do want to take a moment to address the controversy
surrounding this version of the story.
There are two moments near the end of the film that have become very
controversial. In one, a male reacts
positively to the new female costume he’s been given by the wardrobe during the
big fight in the castle. In another,
Lefou (the wonderful Josh Gad) winds up with a male partner during the final
dance and neither seem to mind. There
are reportedly one or two others, but even knowing that I missed them. Combined, these two moments are probably 30 seconds of the two hour running time.
This is not the first time that moments like these have been put into
family movies, even Disney movies (take another look at Enchanted back in 2007 for an early one that stands out in my
mind). Do I wish they weren’t
there? Absolutely! Still, I will not tell anyone this bothers to
see the film or to avoid the film. I am
only providing information and my opinion on it.
With the exception of the two songs from the play I wish
were included, I couldn’t be happier with this version of Beauty and the Beast. I will
be adding it to my collection as soon as it is released and look forward to
enjoying it many more times. Will it
replace the animated version? No. But it will be a nice compliment when I want
to see this story.
I've seen it twice and loved it both times! I haven't ever seen the Broadway version but would love too!
ReplyDeleteThe Broadway version was fabulous, and I loved this movie too. Still love the cartoon more - you're right about the "Me" song!! Would have been great if they'd put it in the new film.
ReplyDeleteI've seen all three versions, though the play version was not on Broadway, but in Melbourne, with a young Hugh Jackman as Gaston. It has been so long since I've seen either the animated or stage version that I was able to simply enjoy the film for what it was.
ReplyDelete