Pros: Relationship between Paul and Luke, made me think
about myself
Cons: Too many plots not fully fleshed out
The Bottom Line:
Paul’s life is ending
Shows us Rome of period
Disjointed plotting
A Look at the Final Days of Paul’s Life
I hadn’t heard much about Paul, Apostle of Christ until a couple of weeks ago. Since I’m always looking for support films good
Christian films, I thought I’d go see it.
I’ve heard a lot of people loved it, but it didn’t really work for me.
This movie takes us to 67 AD. In the aftermath of the burning of Rome,
Emperor Nero has ordered the arrest and execution of all Christians. Paul (James Faulkner) has been arrested,
tried, and convicted. While he awaits
his execution, Luke (Jim Caviezel) slips into the city. Hiding by day with Aquila (John Lynch) and Priscilla
(Joanne Whalley) and the Christians they are helping, he spends his nights
visiting with Paul and talking about his life.
Will his visits go unnoticed?
Should Christians be fleeing the city?
Part of my problem may have been expectations. I really did expect this movie would be
mostly flashbacks to stories from the book of Acts. We do have a few flashbacks to Paul before
his conversion and on the road to Emmaus, but most of the movie actually takes
place in the present.
That’s where the movie falls apart, however. There are at least four different storylines
happening in the present day, and they compete for our attention, especially
early in the movie when the transitions between them are rough. By the time we get to the last to be
introduced, it feels forced. As the
movie progresses, things do smooth out, but at least one just gets dropped as
we near the end of the movie.
What the movie does well is show us the conditions that the
Christians are living under at the time.
They are in fear, and that fear and grief comes through the screen. This is a gritty historical movie, and not a
white washed fantasy historical.
And that’s where the movie gets its PG-13 rating. While there are only a couple of scenes of
Christians being burned as torches in the streets, they definitely make you
cringe. Fortunately, we aren’t treated
to anything in the circuses happening at the time. There are also some images of blood as Paul
deal with the Devil reminding him of his past.
While we hear about Pricilla and Aquila in the Bible, we
don’t see much of them there. I really
enjoyed seeing them as characters here.
Likewise, I enjoyed the portrayal of Luke. There are a couple of scenes between Luke and
Paul that perfectly captured their friendship and history, and I loved them.
While the cast is mostly made up of unknowns, they are all
fantastic. This is a strong ensemble.
While Paul doesn’t just speak in scripture (and I would have
been irritated if he had), some lines from his epistles do slip into his
dialogue. They were always appropriate
and always made me smile when I heard them.
And the movie made me think and examine my life. How would I respond in their situation? How is my faith? Deep questions that made watching this movie
worth it.
In fact, I wonder if my expectations were part of my
problem. Maybe if I’d known we wouldn’t
get much in the way of flashbacks, I would have been better prepared for what
we do get in Paul, Apostle of Christ. As it is, I’m glad I saw the movie, but I
won’t be rushing to see it again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.