Pros: Complex, twisty mystery
Cons: Characters
pretty weak
The Bottom Line:
Wimpy characters
But a great mystery that
Makes up for that flaw
Nancy Drew Debuts with a Great Mystery. If Only the Characters were as Good.
For the first season of The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries, each character solved seven mysteries, half of the fourteen episodes that aired. And, while originally, they alternated weeks, the DVD release of season one focuses on the Hardys for one disc and Nancy Drew for the second. That why, after having watched 7 episodes of the show already, I'm just now watching "The Mystery of Pirate's Cove,"
Nancy Drew (Pamela Sue Martin) and her friends George Fayne
(Jean Rasey) and Ned Nickerson (George O'Hanlon, Jr.) are out for a cruise on
the bay when they spot tons of dead fish and a light in the old
lighthouse. The place is supposed to be
haunted, but Nancy
has never seen any evidence of that before.
Investigating further, Nancy
finds it locked up tight.
The next day, she learns that her father, Carson Drew
(William Schallert), has finally found someone to buy the property. Professor Jack Wall (guest star Monte
Markham) investigates the paranormal, so the claim that it is haunted is the
big draw for him. But something still
isn't sitting right with Nancy . Is the lighthouse haunted?
While the plot had a certain Scooby Doo element (I wouldn't
have been surprised to hear the villain say at the end, "I would have
gotten away with it if it weren't for you meddling kids."), I found it
very well done. I was surprised by most
of the deductions Nancy
suddenly announced, yet they were logical and never felt forced. I did feel that they used a deus ex machina
at the end to get Nancy
out of danger, but again it tied up the loose ends, so I'm not going to
complain too loudly there either.
My real complaint is the characterization. Having seen the way they cut supporting
characters and changed them around in the Hardy Boys episodes, I was expecting
that here. But I don't get the changes
they made. Nancy fared the best, being a
bit more down to earth than in the books, although the screams she lets out a
couple of times were completely out of character. Then there's poor George. Ascent from the TV show, or at least this
episode, is loyal sidekick Bess. So what
did they do? They gave George all of
Bess's attributes. Instead of being a
tomboy, she's a bit of a wimp who loves to shop. Why not just make that Bess and leave George
out? Then there's poor Ned. Instead of being Nancy 's
boyfriend, he's a guy who works for Carson Drew and has a secret crush on Nancy . Yet they've made him so weak and unappealing
I can't see why anyone would ever fall for him.
Yeah, so it's the book geek in me having problems with the
characters. But these changes really
don't make any sense to me. Unlike the
Hardy Boys episodes where I could see why they made the changes they did, this
remains the only unsolved mystery of the episode. Hopefully, these characters will grow on me
as the season progresses.
I'm not going to blame the acting. Oh, there's some 70's cheese to the
performances (and the show in general), but I found all the performances
believable. My issues with the characters
come straight from the writers.
I actually thought this was a really good first episode in the Nancy Drew series and thought Pamela Sue Martin made a great Nancy Drew and I enjoyed Jean Rasey's portrayal of George, although Ned comes over as a bit wimpy. I do agree about the characterization, though. Nancy screaming quite so much at seeing a bat and then again when seeing the skeleton are not what you would have expected from Nancy Drew, George was actually Bess in disguise and Ned just wasn't the Ned from the books. I was surprised that when Nancy confronted Jack Wall towards the end that he didn't knock Nancy Drew unconscious, as seemed to happen in most of the books. However, overall, I thought this was an excellent episode and there was certainly no fault with the acting.
ReplyDelete