Pros: Rich characters and writing
Cons: Very weak plot
The Bottom Line:
Plot? Disappointing
But I still liked characters
Wanted to like more
Sir John Fielding Eventually Solves the Grub Street Massacre
I really had intended to get back to this series
sooner. I read the first historical
fiction mystery about Sir John Fielding two years ago. I enjoyed it and immediately bought Murder in Grub Street, the second. And there it
has sat ever since. Turns out the time
spent setting it aside wasn't a bad thing since this book wasn't as good as the
first.
The series stars real life magistrate Sir John
Fielding. He presided over one of the
courts in London
during the 1700's. He also happened to
be blind. These mysteries are narrated
from the point of view of Jeremy Proctor, here a thirteen-year-old boy. Jeremy has become a ward of Sir John and
often acts as his eyes and general gofer when a puzzling case comes up. However, as the first book ended, Jeremy had
been set up with an internship to a printer.
This book opens the night before Jeremy is set to begin that
apprenticeship on Grub Street. But his
last night living with Sir John is interrupted by a tragedy. The family Jeremy was to work for is brutally
murdered. When a deranged poet is found
with a bloody axe in his hand, it appears to be an open and shut case.
Sir John isn't convinced, however. With Jeremy's help, he begins looking into
the matter. Can he find the truth?
I am glad to say that the characters are just as wonderful
as I remember them. Jeremy, as our
narrator is the best developed. He's a
very rich character on the border between childhood and adulthood. Sir John is a healthy mix of justice and
compassion. To be honest, I didn't
remember any of the other supporting characters from the last book, but I have
a feeling I was supposed to know one or two already. My lack of memory didn't matter. They were well drawn here. And the characters obviously created for this
story were equally rich.
The book is written as if Jeremy were recording the story
years later from his own memory aided by research into the matter. This allows for a few editorial comments as
Jeremy reflects on his own actions.
These interjections never last for more than a sentence or two, but I
found it a nice addition. The writing
style is much more complex than the average book written today. It strikes a balance between capturing the
writing style of the period without being so dense it turns off modern
readers. I had to read this one more
slowly than I normally would.
The big problem with the book is the plot. The murder actually becomes a sub-plot. Instead, the book spends a lot of time
discussing other issues going on in the area at the time. But here's the funny thing. The solution to the mystery is actually
telegraphed early. We're talking
everything down to the motive. So while
I was enjoying the characters and writing style, I was growing frustrated with
the plot.
While not a Christian book, Christian end times prophecy
came up a couple times in relation to the plot.
I actually found these funny since the same discussions are still going
on today.
It turns out that Murder in Grub Street was a couple steps
down from the excellent series starter.
While I am still interested in continuing the series, I'm not as anxious
to get back to it as I expected to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.