Pros: 9 good mysteries with logical solutions
Cons: One impossible case; weak characters
The Bottom Line:
Match wits with genius
Even now as an adult
I'm no match for him
I'm Still No Match for Encyclopedia Brown
Back in the day, I was a die hard Encyclopedia Brown
fan. I recently discovered that, not
only are the old book still in print, but new books are being written about
him. Curious, I picked up one of the
newest, Encyclopedia Brown and the Case of the Jumping Frogs. It brought smiles to my face as I was once
again stumped.
For those not familiar with the series, Encyclopedia Brown
is a 10-year-old who is incredibly smart (hence his nick name). His father is the chief of police in
Idaville. While he occasionally helps
his dad with an especially difficult case, most of this book is devoted to
helping his friends in the neighborhood.
Each book in the series presents 10 cases. We get all the facts along side
Encyclopedia. Each chapter ends with him
making some kind of announcement stating that he's solve the case. Our job as the reader is to catch the
criminal's mistake that gave them away.
But if you missed it, there is a one page solution in the back of the
book that explains what tipped Encyclopedia off. The tip off is usually some obscure fact that
proves they lied, although occasionally they contradicted a fact given earlier
in the story. And that's all I will say
so as not to spoil the solutions to any of the stories here.
I was surprised to see most of the opening chapter hasn't
changed from when I read them as a kid.
In fact, I could probably have quoted it from memory. But the stories are all new. The first chapter features him helping his
father capture a jewel thief. From
there, he spends the rest of the book helping the neighborhood kids. He saves them from investing in a pill that
stops water leaks. He identifies the author
of an essay. He stops several
thefts. And, yes, he still has a couple
of run ins with Bugs Meany, the most appropriately named bully in kid lit
history.
As a kid, I always tried to solve the mystery without
flipping to the solution in the back. And
I was thrilled if I did that once a book.
I am proud to announce that as an adult...I solved two of them without
Encyclopedia's help. I was on the right
track with a few of the others, and if I had given myself the time to think
about it, I probably would have gotten them.
The rest? I was stumped pure and
simple. Only one of the solutions was so
obscure to not really be fair, however.
The others were so obvious I felt stupid for not seeing them.
I must say, the book wasn't quite how I remembered the
series, however. I thought the
characters were more developed than presented here. That might have been the case. But it could also be that they just seemed
more developed to the 10-year-old who originally read them.
I was also surprised at how short the chapters were. Each one was between 5 and 6 pages, including
one pencil illustration per chapter.
Frankly, there is hardly time for much character development with the limited
space to tell a story.
But despite those changes, I must admit I still had a ball
reading Encyclopedia Brown and the Case of the Jumping Frogs. I smiled quite often watching the smartest
10-year-old in the world snare criminals of all stripes in their evil deeds.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.