Pros: Witty lines, great performances and special effects
Cons: Confusing story and mythology; ending
The Bottom Line:
Effects are king here
Story, people sacrificed
Wish it were better
"Getting to the Land of the Dead is Easy. It's Getting Back That is Hard."
Sequels walk a fine line. They get made because lots of people love the characters. We want to see them again. Yet we don't want to see their lives change too much. And we don't want to see them doing the same old thing over again. At World's End, the third movie in the Pirates of theCaribbean
franchise, tries to keep the characters out of familiar territory. But I think
that was what it sorely needed.
"Getting to the Land of the Dead is Easy. It's Getting Back That is Hard."
Sequels walk a fine line. They get made because lots of people love the characters. We want to see them again. Yet we don't want to see their lives change too much. And we don't want to see them doing the same old thing over again. At World's End, the third movie in the Pirates of the
When last we saw our characters (in the cliffhanger from the
last film), Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) had been swallowed by a giant
sea creature and presumed dead. Fortunately, all is not lost. He's only in Davy
Jones' Locker. So Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and Elizabeth Swann (Keira
Knightly) reluctantly team up with a shockingly alive Captain Barbossa
(Geoffrey Rush) to free him.
Meanwhile, Lord Becket (Tom Hollander) has captured Davy
Jones' (Bill Nighy) heart. He is using his control over Jones and his ship, the
Flying Dutchman, to hunt down pirates. To stop him, a meeting of the Pirate
Lords is called. And since Jack is one of them, he must be rescued. Will his
rescuers find him and a way to get all of them back to the land of the living?
Let's be perfectly honest. The main draw of this series is
Johnny Depp's Jack Sparrow. He takes a selfish drunk and makes him funny and
interesting. He's in top form here. I had heard reports about how long it was
into the movie before we saw him, but I think those reports were wrong. Either
way, the movie picks up once he appears.
Not that the other characters don't get their fair share of
witty lines. My friends and I laughed our way through the first two hours of
the two and a half hour film. I was trying to keep track of all the witty
lines, but I just couldn't do it.
The other actors do a great job of bringing their characters
to life. Geoffrey Rush made Barbossa into an interesting character. I actually
found myself liking him, something I didn't think I could do after the first
film. Knightly and Bloom were great again, and the supporting cast did a great
job supporting. Much was made of Keith Richard's appearance, but it was really
just an extended cameo. Those scenes are great, however. They were rather proud
of getting Chow Yun-Fat as one of the pirate lords for the film, but his part
was smaller then I expected as well.
The series is also known for the special effects, and this
installment is no exception. The man/creatures are just as great as the last
film, and the scenes that involved ships facing dangerous water were believable
as well.
But this is where the movie starts to fall apart. I had no
problem with the long running time, but I expected to be rewarded with a
coherent plot for that. Instead, I felt like I needed a score card to keep
track of who was doing what to whom. Of course, since it changed every five
minutes, it really didn't matter.
The problems with the plot are enhanced by the increasing complex
mythology surrounding the films. The supernatural element got out of hand here.
I didn't mind the simple ghost story of the first one, but on top of the
already complex plot, adding layers of myth to the movie made things worse.
I think this is where the people behind the movie missed the
point. Despite the long running time, the first movie is really very simple.
There are one or two motives for all the characters, and the supernatural
element is pretty simple. If they'd stuck with that, even while introducing new
characters and new situations, it could have worked. Instead, they let their
imagination run wild without thinking about if they could really tell that
story well.
This movie assumes you have seen the first two in the
series. If you haven't you'll be lost. Granted, you'll be lost at least once
even if you have seen them. But think how much worse it will be if you don't
know who the characters are.
Because of the complexity of the plot, Will and Elizabeth's
romance, a pretty important plotline in the first two, is short shafted here.
It is here, but it seems like an add on to the story instead of an important
part of it.
Another thing missing from this movie are references to the
famous rides. The first two had blink and you miss then scenes that mirrored
stuff you see while riding at Disneyland .
Maybe I blinked at the wrong time, but I didn't see any here.
Unlike the first two, there was really only one memorable
fight sequence here. It was clever, well down, and very entertaining. The
others were enjoyable, but not up to the level of this one.
Then there's the climax. I won't spoil it. I'll just say it
was not what I expected. And that wasn't a good thing.
One report on TV said this was the scariest of the three and
think before taking your kids. While I do agree parents may want to consider
the PG-13 rating, I didn't think there was anything worse then what we saw in
the last film.
The quality of the movies in the series continues to
decline. Don't watch Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End expecting the entertainment of the first movie. That
ship has sailed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.