Pros: Acting brings a powerful story to life
Cons: Mary Badham too old, slow first hour
The Bottom Line:
Once it gets going
You will find yourself enthralled
A classic story
Message That Still Resonates Today
I am a bit ashamed to admit my first exposure to the
American classic story To Kill a Mockingbird came last year in the form of a
stage play. It was fabulous, and I
quickly saw why the story is so well known.
When the movie was on TV a couple weeks back, I decided I needed to
watch it.
The story is told through the memories of Scout, the young
daughter of Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck).
During the summers of the 1930’s, Scout’s (Mary Badham) life is filled
with playing with her older brother (Phillip Alford) and their visiting
neighbor (John Megna).
But there is trouble in town. A black man (Brock Peters) has been accused
of raping a white woman (Collin Wilcox), and Atticus agrees to defend him. Will he get a fair trial in this small
Southern town?
The heart of this film is the courtroom drama and the
fallout from it. When the film is there,
it is captivating. The climax is
emotionally harsh for several reasons, and I was surprised at how much I had
come to care for the characters.
One thing that makes this work is the final act. It doesn’t go where you expect it to, and the
jolt packs much of the wallop of the story.
However, the movie suffers from some pacing issues. The first hour builds character, but it does
so slowly. In fact, it’s hard to tell
where exactly the plot is in all that is happening. Yes, you need it to fully appreciate the
second half, but dang is it slow.
My other gripe is with Mary Badham. No, I’m not criticizing her acting because I
think she does a fine job. But it’s
established that Scout is six and her older brother is twelve. Yet she only looks a year or two younger than
her brother. That’s because Mary was
actually ten when she was in this movie.
I’d argue that it would be hard for a six year old to pull off the part,
but it kept throwing me out of the film when they mentioned her age.
As I said, she did a great job in the movie, as did the
entire cast did. The villains were a tad
on the caricature side, but they didn’t have much time to develop. Our heroes are great, however, led by Gregory
Peck, who won an Oscar for his work here.
Other fun appearances are Robert Duvall in a small role and William
Windom, who I know best from Murder, She Wrote, as the prosecutor.
While the children are the characters we see this story
through, this is not a movie for children.
It involves rape and a few very tense, scary scenes as well as a couple
of deaths. All but one of these scenes
takes place off camera, and nothing remotely graphic is shown. Honestly, most of it will probably go over
kid’s heads. But I think you need to be
a teenager to really understand and appreciate the story here. The other thing to keep in mind is some uses
of the N word. While jarring today (as
it should be), this is certainly in keeping with the time when the film was
set.
Even though it was released in the early 60’s, it was filmed
in Black and White. Don’t let that scare
you away because it’s important to see and think about the story presented
here.
Obviously, the story shows the dangers of racism. Unfortunately, it’s still something we need
to be reminded about today. But in a
broad sense, it shows the importance of reviewing all the evidence and giving
someone the benefit of the doubt instead of rushing to judge them. That’s something that we seem to have
forgotten, as we’ve seen time and time again in recent years.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by. In order to combat spam, I moderate most comments. I'll get to your comment as soon as I can.