Pros: Intriguing first half and fun second half
Cons: Very dated
The Bottom Line:
Very
dated film
But this sci-fi comedy
Mix still entertains
Flight of the Navigator is one of those movies I remember
fondly from my childhood. As an adult, I
don't find it quite as much fun as I did then, but it is still enjoyable.
It's 1978, and David Freeman (Joey Cramer) is enjoying the
4th of July with his family. When he
goes to get his brother from a neighbor's, he takes a short cut through some
woods and falls down a little hill. He
quickly gets up and goes home, only to find that his family doesn't live there.
It takes a while, but David learns that it is now 1986 (the
year the movie came out), and he's been missing for 8 years. He hasn't aged at all, but so his little brother
is now older than he is.
Even stranger, his mind can communicate with machines. NASA quickly makes a connection between him
and a UFO they've found. Will that
explain where David has gone?
The movie pretty much splits itself into two halves. The first half is a pretty serious mystery as
the characters try to determine just what has happened to David. But once David connects up with Max, the
computer program in charge of the UFO, things take a trip into comedy. Max is voiced by Paul Reubens, and his
personality (and personality change) is a riot.
We go from mystery to comedy in a heartbeat, and I love every minute of
the ride.
Of course, the movie hasn't aged perfectly. The effects are dated at times, like the
early computer effects when the UFO creates stairs or the wires operating some
of the aliens. On the other hand, the
ship looks like it is really flying through the air, and Max is completely
believable.
In an effort to show just how out of touch David is after
being gone for 8 years, there are lots of references to current pop culture
that are laughable now, even if you suffer from nostalgia. It is definitely a product of the 80's.
The acting is also a bit of a mixed bag. There are no real standout performances
except maybe Paul Reubens' voice work as Max.
Don't get me wrong, the acting doesn't pull you out of the movie, but it's
not that outstanding either. Most
interesting to me is the inclusion of Sarah Jessica Parker in one of her early
roles and Howard Hesseman as the NASA scientist trying to learn all he can from
David.
Parents will want to know that, despite the PG rating, I
caught at least two uses of the s word.
There's also lots of name calling between the brothers in the film.
It is your blog and review of course, but I don't know how you can blame a 30 year old movie for being dated. I mean if effects made today look bad, that is an issue. Or if a movie made in the 80s has 50s effects, then that is bad. But 30 years will make almost any movie look dated
ReplyDeleteObviously, my thoughts on dated effects aren't quite coming across as intended. Most of the time, I'm noting it but not really basing my rating on it unless they are truly bad. As much as I love this movie, it screams 80's. That's not necessarily a bad thing since that's when it was made, but you have to be ready for that when you sit down to watch it. And people who haven't seen the movie should know that.
Delete